Seventy percent, that is, and actually more would be better.
If you know this blog, you already know that I’m talking about native
plants. People often ask how many native plants or what percentage should they
have. A study by Doug Tallamy and his team* found that at least 70% was required
and that even higher numbers are needed to keep bird populations from
declining.
The following quote is from the linked article: “As the amount of non-native plants increased in a yard, the birds were less likely to occupy and breed; for ones who did breed, they produced fewer young than birds breeding in native-dominated yards.”
If you’d like to have birds in your yard, or if you’d like
to support birds in general, having keystone native plants and a diversity of them is important. Here is a list of keystone plants; you may already have some.
Don’t feel like this is an unreachable number or a huge task. If you have native
oak and maple trees in your yard, they are likely contributing in a big way to
your total biomass. The number one opportunity for improvement is usually reducing the
lawn. My early January post gave some ideas for working through this bit by bit.
This quote from the Science Daily article that I
linked in the first paragraph is particularly insightful:
"The important lesson is that use of non-native plants in landscaping has a 'trickle-up' effect," said Doug Levey, a biological sciences program director at NSF. "Those attractive, non-native plants just provide less food at the base of the food chain and thus support fewer birds than native plants."
Hummingbird on purple coneflower by Gena Flanigen |
* Study details: Narango, Desirée L., Douglas W.
Tallamy, and Peter P. Marra. Desirée. 2018. Nonnative plants reduce
population growth of an insectivorous bird. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America.
Both winterberry holly and serviceberry are at the Monastery here in Rockdale County in Georgia if anyone wants to see how lovely they look in a landscape.
ReplyDelete